House v. Mainka’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 1962 · most notably Jenkins v. Frederick (1952), Carman v. McMahan (1947)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lind v. McKinley · Shnier v. Vahlberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The notice of resale was erroneous in that it was excessive, in the sum of approximately $6, which was the portion of the 1940' taxes which had not yet become due and delinquent. That error and excessive amount in the notice for the reason indicated renders the sale invalid.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyes v. Goss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.