Anthony v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2018
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Keating Implement & Machine Co. v. Marshall Electric Light & Power Co. · Meshek v. Cordes · 79 Cal. App. 770 - Western Elec. Co., Inc. v. Colley · Garfield Oil Co. v. Crews · Fechet v. Drake
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court indicated that because of the volume of business and lack of time he was disinclined to hold several hearings in the matter and desired to dispose of it at one hearing. This was within the discretion of the court and no prejudice is shown to have resulted to defendant by such action. The findings and judgment of the court are clearly right and are sustained by the law and the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“all improvements and every right of whatever character pertaining to the premises described.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mooney v. Mooney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.