Moore v. Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1964
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stolfa v. Gaines · Mansfield, Brunson, Kemp & Ahrens v. King · Gibson v. Johnson · Shepard v. Gibson · Burroughs v. Burroughs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Stolfa v. Gaines, 140 Okla. 292 , 283 P. 563 , and again in Mansfield-Brunson-Kemp & Ahrens v. King, 160 Okla. 243 , 16 P. 2d 87 , we held that a cross-petition in an action to quiet title did not constitute a counterclaim within the meaning of the proviso in Sec. 273, supra, and that plaintiff could plead the statute of limitations against the cause of action plead in the cross-petition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.