Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 S.C. 474 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
11
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Worthley v. Worthley (1955), McKeel v. McKeel (1946)

2 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 11 states

9019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It should be borne in mind that the enforcement of an alimony decree in this State, as in other states, differs radically from the enforcement of an ordinary money judgment. In the latter case, subject to some exceptions not pertinent here, enforcement may be had by execution against property only, and not by attachment for contempt. But in the case of a decree for alimony a defaulting husband may be imprisoned if he fails to make payment in accordance with the terms of the decree.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the former appeal we held that a decree for alimony granted by a Florida Court may be established in this State as a local judgment and enforced by equitable remedies, such as contempt proceedings against the defendant for failure to comply with the judgment of the Court, in such manner as is customary in the enforcement of domestic decrees for alimony by and through the equity Courts of this State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and the procedure of enforcement to be followed is a matter exclusively for our Courts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.