Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 SO 379 - Bell v. Holdcraft

Bell v. Holdcraft’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1984

22 state decisions

8019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Robinson · City of New Orleans v. Le Bourgeois · Nessans v. Colomes · Burthe v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We fail to see where appellant was guilty of any laches. He was justified in relying upon his lawyer to give him notice, and if his lawyer intended to quit the case, he rightfully could rely upon being notified of that fact. Most lawyers appreciate a client who will act as appellant did and not constantly worry them about business which has been left in their hands for attention. Lawyers are officers of the law and court, and their clients have a right to expect of them that they will look after to the best of their ability the business left in their hands.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An appeal will lie from a judgment rendered by default * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.