Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 So. 2d 745 - State v. Allen

196 So. 2d 745 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably 417 So. 2d 678 - Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp. (1982), 349 So. 2d 170 - Milar Galleries, Inc. v. Miller (1977)

28 state decisions

150196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Stromberg · Greyhound Corporation v. Carswell · Whaley v. State · Robbins v. Cipes · Proctor v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Deficiencies in form or substance in the notice of appeal shall not be jurisdictional and shall not be ground for dismissal of the appeal unless it be clearly shown that the complaining party was misled or prejudiced by such deficiencies.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... in testing the sufficiency of the notice, the record itself should be examined. Where the examination of the notice of the appeal and other appellate documents such as assignments of error, briefs and other pertinent papers show that the parties have not been misled or prejudiced by any deficiencies or ambiguities in the notice itself, the dismissal of such an appeal would not only be contrary to prior precedents of this Court but inconsistent with the concept of our appellate procedures and the true administration of justice. Id. at 522 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.