Trahan v. Broussard’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 1983
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boyet v. Perryman · Succession of Lampton · Succession of Rosinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An action by a person who is an heir or legatee of a deceased person, and who has not been recognized as such in the judgment of possession rendered in the succession of the deceased by a court of competent jurisdiction, to assert any right, title, or interest in any of the property formerly owned by the deceased against a third person who has acquired this property from or through a person recognized as an heir or legatee of the deceased in this judgment of possession, is prescribed in ten years if the third person, or his ancestors in title, singly or collectively, have been in continuous, uninterrupted, peaceable, public, and unequivocal possession of the property for such period after the registry of the judgment of possession in the conveyance records of the parish where the property is situated. "As used herein, `third person' means a person other than one recognized as an heir or legatee of the deceased in the judgment of possession."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trahan v. Broussard“* * * when the creditor has been silent for a certain time without urging his claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trahan v. Broussard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.