Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 SO3D 102 - State ex rel. J.C.

State ex rel. J.C.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc. · In re A.J.F. · State in the Interest of S.M.W. · 914 So. 2d 34 - Stelluto v. Stelluto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must contain appropriate decretal language disposing of or dismissing claims in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ppeals are taken from judgments, not reasons for judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.