196 So. 3d 748 - Casey v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 708 So. 2d 731 - Evans v. Lungrin · Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. · 41 So. 3d 438 - HARRAH'S BOSSIER CITY INV. CO. v. Bridges · 367 So. 2d 745 - State v. Bradford · 84 So. 3d 479 - McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The meaning and intent of a law is determined by considering the law in its entirety and ... placing a construction on the provision in question that is consistent with the express terms of the law and with the obvious intent of the Legislature in enacting it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appl[y the law] as written and [make] no further interpretation ... in search of the intent of the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.