196 So. 3d 902 - Jackson v. Sumlin’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 52 So. 3d 909 - Input/Output Marine Systems, Inc. v. Wilson Greatbatch, Technologies, Inc. · 113 So. 3d 1109 - Claiborne Medical Corp. v. Siddiqui · 983 So. 2d 160 - Laviolette v. Dubose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) When a court renders a partial judgment ... as to one or more but less than all of the claims, demands, issues, or theories against a party, whether in an original demand, reconventional demand, cross-claim, third-party claim, or intervention, the judgment shall not constitute a final judgment unless it is designated as a final judgment by the court after an express determination that there is no just reason for delay." (2) In the absence of such a determination and designation, any such order or decision shall not constitute a final judgment for the purpose of an immediate appeal and may be revised at any time prior to the rendition of the judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'Krepki v. O'Krepki
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.