Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 SW 615 - Stuart v. Meyer

Stuart v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
March 1956
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1956

17 state decisions

8019171920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine Co. · Johnson v. Portwood · Durkin v. Cobleigh · Thomas v. Hammond · Neyland v. Bendy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule which excludes parol evidence when offered to contradict or vary the terms, provisions, or legal effect off written instruments has no application to collateral undertakings or cases in which the written instrument was executed in part performance of an entire oral agreement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.