Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 SW3D 334 - Abbott v. State

Abbott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 40th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Bruton v. United States · Krulewitch v. United States · Satterwhite v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals constitutional error that is subject to harmless error review, the court of appeals must reverse a judgment of conviction or punishment unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is a jury, not a reviewing court, that accepts or rejects reasonably equal competing theories of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.