Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 S.W.3d 655

Barry v. Ashner Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-07-18

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellants, Daniel Barry (“Barry”) and Linda Gochenauer (“Gochenauer”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, entered after a bench trial, denying Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment, quiet title, slander of title, and specific performance, and granting Respondent’s, Ashner Company (“Ash-ner”), counterclaim requesting, inter alia, the trial court to reform the deed in question. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the decision of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

/196/sw3d/655 · .json · Public domain