Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 TENN 624 - Cox v. State

Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2000

4 state decisions

20195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sykes v. State · Jamison v. State · Vinson v. State · Holt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant is entitled to require the election before he introduces any proof so that he can meet by his proof the evidence upon which the State relies . The state can make a voluntary election as soon as its proof is in, and the prosecuting attorney will thus be relieved of any embarrassment and enabled to concentrate his efforts . The error committed immediately touched constitutional rights of the defendant, and he is therefore entitled to a new trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.