Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 U.S. 337 - Creede Cripple Creek Mining Milling Company v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Transportation Company

Creede Cripple Creek Mining Milling Company v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Transportation Company’s Empirical Analysis

196 U.S. 337 · 1905

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 16 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2006 · most notably Cameron v. United States (1920), Cole v. Ralph (1920)

36 federal appellate · 16 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 10 states

45019051910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUinta Tunnel Min. & Transp. Co. v. Creede & Cripple Creek Min. & Mill. Co. (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp. · Belk v. Meagher · Deffeback v. Hawke · Erhardt Boaro · United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘The miners of each mining district may make regulations not in conflict with the laws of the United States, or with the laws of the state or territory in which the district is situated, governing the location, manner of recording, amount of work necessary to hold possession of a mining claim, subject to the following requirements: The location must be distinctly marked on the ground so'that its boundaries can be readily traced. All records of mining claims hereafter made shall contain the * * names of the locators, the date of location, and such a description of the daim or claims located by reference to some natural object or permanent monument as will identify the claim. On each claim located after the tenth day of May, eighteen hundred and seventy-two. and until a patent has been issued therefor, not less than one hundred dollars’ worth of labor shall be performed or improvements made during each year.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no location of a mining-claim shall be made until the discovery of the vein or lode within the limits of the claim located,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “would be a useless and idle ceremony, which the law does not require.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.