Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 U.S. 589 - Oceanic Steam Navigation Company v. John W Aitken

Oceanic Steam Navigation Company v. John W Aitken’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
14
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably Arizona Copper Co v. Hammer Same, Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. v. State Baltimore Broadcasting Corp. (1949)

6 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 14 states

10019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on The Silvia · The " Scotland" · The Chattahoochee · The Iroquois · The Carib Prince

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it is a mistake to say, as the petitioner does, that if the man on the spot, even an expert, does what his judgment approves, he cannot be found negligent. The standard of conduct, whether left to the jury or laid down by the court, is an external standard, and takes no account of the personal equation of the man concerned. The notion that it ‘should be coextensive with the judgment of each individual’ was exploded, if it needed exploding, by Chief Justice Tindal, in Vaughan v. Menlove, 3 Bing. N. C. 468.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.