Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 VA 322 - Petrus v. Robbins

Petrus v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2003 · most notably Haring v. Prosise (1983), Bates v. Devers (1974)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions

130195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · Russell v. Place · Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. Emery · Todhunter v. Smith · Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. Heller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plea of res judicata or estoppel of record may be successfully invoked upon a final judgment or decree of a court of inferior or limited jurisdiction, as well as upon the judgment or decree of a court of record of general jurisdiction, provided the inferior court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]o render the judgment conclusive, it must appear by the record of the prior suit that the particular matter sought to be concluded was necessarily tried or determined,—that is, that the verdict could not have been rendered without deciding that matter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.