Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 WIS 534 - State v. Cannon

State v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
12
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Attorney General of Maryland v. Waldron (1981), 106 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Holmes (1982)

1 district · 43 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1001928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Damselle Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad Company · Michaelson v. United States Chicago St P M & O Ry Co · John Briscoe v. President Directors Bank Commonwealth Kentucky · State ex rel. Attorney General v. Circuit Court for Eau Claire County · Pauly v. Keebler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no question but that the legislature has power to regulate admission to the bar by prescribing a standard therefor, and it is the duty, as it should be the pleasure, of the court to give full effect to all reasonable efforts, in that regard. Further, in case of the legislature having, as here, prescribed conditions of eligibility to admission to practice law, which are reasonable, want of such conditions should be regarded as insurmountable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.