196 Wis. 2d 308 - State v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Norman (2003), The Hope Clinic, et al. v. James E. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois (1999)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 41 Md. App. 277 - Smith v. State · 65 Wis. 2d 525 - Fells v. State · 83 Wis. 2d 368 - Whitaker v. State · State v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must not be so few or of such an equivocal nature as to render doubtful the existence of the requisite criminal intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'the complaint does not charge an offense known to law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The circuit courts have the general jurisdiction prescribed for them by article VII of the constitution and have power to issue all writs, process and commissions provided in article VII of the constitution or by the statutes, or which may be necessary to the due execution of the powers vested in them. The circuit courts have power to hear and determine, within their respective circuits, all civil and criminal actions and proceedings unless exclusive jurisdiction is given to some other court; and they have all the powers, according to the usages of courts of law and equity, necessary to the full and complete jurisdiction of the causes and parties and the full and complete administration of justice, and to carry into effect their judgments, orders and other determinations, subject to review by the court of appeals or the supreme court as provided by law. The courts and the judges thereof have power to award all such writs, process and commissions, throughout the state, returnable in the proper county.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.