196 Wis. 2d 45 - State v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley (1996), State v. Allen (2004)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mills v. Alabama · 28 Wis. 2d 412 - Gauthier v. State · 187 Wis. 2d 346 - State v. Toliver · 117 Wis. 2d 9 - State v. Daniels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assertions)). The court in Saunders also noted: The issue is not whether specific factual assertions or general factual assertions may suffice. Rather, the issue is whether Saunders has alleged information which is”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Factual objectivity refers to facts in the sense of what is really true, while opinion subjectivity refers to mere 'opinion' or personal taste.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]nly when the evidence is inherently or patently incredible will [the court] substitute [its] judgment for that of the factfinder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.