Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 W. Va. 416 - State v. Knuckles

196 W. Va. 416 - State v. Knuckles’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne Cannon (2008), State of West Virginia v. Lillie Mae Trail (2015)

26 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · 194 W. Va. 657 - State v. Guthrie · 194 W. Va. 3 - State v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he authentication requirement of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence requires only that a party introducing evidence demonstrate that the evidence is in fact what its proponent claims. W. Va. R. Evid. 901(a). The “chain of custody” rule is simply a variation of this principle and requires that a prosecutor seeking to introduce evidence must establish a chain of custody from the time the items were taken to show that they are in substantially the same condition as when they were seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “waiver necessarily precludes salvage by plain error review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.