Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 W. Va. 615 - State v. Todd Andrew H.

196 W. Va. 615 - State v. Todd Andrew H.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2012

18 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · Whren v. United States · United States v. Sokolow · Florida v. Bostick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mere confession of error by the State, of course, does not dictate the hand of this Court nor tire outcome of this case.” State v. Todd Andrew H., 196 W.Va. 615 , 618 n. 6, 474 S.E.2d 545 , 548 n. 6 (1996). See also Syl. pt. 8, State v. Julius, 185 W.Va. 422 , 408 S.E.2d 1 (1991) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]robable cause to make an arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and the circumstances within the knowledge of the arresting officers are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that an offense has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]ransporting a citizen, involuntarily, miles to a police station for purposes of interrogation is the functional equivalent of an arrest requiring probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.