State v. Patten’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullin v. Phelps · State v. Parker · State v. Brillon · State v. Shippee · State v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These requirements can be distilled into a three-part test: the prior bad-act evidence (1) must be offered for a genuine, noncharacter purpose, (2) must be relevant to that noncharacter purpose, and (3) the probative value of the evidence must not be substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hood“relevant to complainant's 'level of intimidation and cooperation/consent.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hood“was 'part and parcel' with the sexual contact”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.