State v. Preston’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The idea of committing the offense started with law enforcement officers or their agents rather than with the pei’son. 2. The law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense. 3. The person was not predisposed to commit the type of offense charged before the law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the person to commit the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.