Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Ark. 650 - Meyer v. Eichenbaum

Meyer v. Eichenbaum’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1982

6 state decisions

20193919401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Browning v. Ashbrook's · Hunt v. Williams · Roberts's Appeal · Thomson's Appeal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when used in testamentary matters, indicates income or interest, unless the context indicates a different idea or meaning. In the appraisement and interpretation of this will, we are not at liberty to take the isolated word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.