Shaw v. McMahon’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 604 (§ 404 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 607 (§ 407 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 28 Cal. 3d 692 - California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College District · 16 Cal. 3d 583 - In Re Marriage of Bouquet · Shea v. Vialpando · 67 Cal. 2d 733 - Morris v. Williams · 71 Cal. 2d 566 - Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`To do so would not be interpreting the legislative intent but would be a gross example of judicial legislation in contravention of the legislative intent logically implied from the rejection by the Legislature of an identical provision.' ( People v. Brannon (1973) 32 Cal. App.3d 971, 977 [ 108 Cal. Rptr. 620 ]; accord, Western Land Office, Inc. v. Cervantes (1985) 175 Cal. App.3d 724, 741 [ 220 Cal. Rptr. 784 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.