Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Colo. 227 - Tatum v. Cronin

Tatum v. Cronin’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wynsma v. Leach · Gordon v. Cronin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... [N]o showing of probable cause is necessary for the extradition of a person who has been convicted and sentenced .... Extradition is based not upon violation of the terms of his probation, but upon the substantive criminal offense for which the appellant has not yet completed his sentence. Under such circumstances, all that is required is a record of the conviction and a statement by the governor of the requisition state that the person sought has violated the terms of his-probation.” (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.