Noe v. Dolan’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Ricci v. Davis (1981), People v. Swain (1998)
4 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Thomas · Dolan v. Rust · 37 Colo. App. 372 - Eight Thousand West Corporation v. Stewart · People v. Brown · People in Interest of MKA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The repeal ... of any statute ... shall not have the effect to release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any ... liability ... which shall have been incurred under such statute, unless the repealing ... act so expressly provides, and such statute ... so repealed ... shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings ... for the enforcement of such ... liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment ... which can or may be rendered, entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings ... imposing ... such ... liability.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Authority to suspend license — to deny license — type of conviction — points. (l)(a) The department has the authority to suspend the license of any driver who, in accordance with the schedule of points set forth in this section, has been convicted of traffic viola tions resulting in the accumulation of twelve points within any twelve consecutive months or eighteen points within any twenty-four consecutive months, or, in the case of a provisional driver, who has accumulated eight points within any twelve consecutive months, or twelve points within any twenty-four consecutive months, or fourteen points within the time period for which the license was issued. ... [[Image here]] (4) Statutory provisions for cancellation and mandatory revocation of drivers’ licenses shall take precedence over this section. (5) Point system schedule: Type of conviction Points [[Image here]] (b)(1) Driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or with an excessive alcoholic content pursuant to section 42-4-1202(l)(a) or (1.5).12 [[Image here]] (8.5)(a) Whenever the department receives notice that a person has pled guilty to, or been found guilty by a court or a jury of, a violation of section 42-4-1202(l)(a), (l)(c), or (1.5) and receives the license surrendered by such person to the court pursuant to section 42-2-123.3, the department shall forthwith suspend the license of such person for a period of not less than one year. [[Image here]] (11) If at the hearing held pursuant to subsectio”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a criminal penalty is at issue, [the supreme court] has consistently adhered to the principle enunciated in [ Thomas ] that a defendant is entitled to the benefits of amendatory legislation when relief is sought before finality has attached to the judgment of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Boyd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.