Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Colo. 559 - People v. Williams

People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wimberly v. Ettenberg · People v. Hinderlider · Jones v. Board of Adjustment

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The requirement [that the regulations be published and that amended and repealed regulations be kept and cross-indexed] not having been met, by stating that the rule shall not ‘be relied upon or cited against’ the General Assembly has stated that the rule is not admissible in evidence. * * *” Williams, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No rule shall be relied upon or cited against any person unless, if adopted after May 1, 1959, it has been published and, whether adopted before or after said date, has been made available to the public in accordance with this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.