Murray v. Gadsden’s Empirical Analysis
197 F.2d 194 · 1952
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 9 district · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Duggan v. Keto (1989), United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co. (1955)
34 federal appellate · 9 district · 61 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peugh v. Davis · Milholland v. Whalen · Whalen v. Milholland · Harrington v. Emmerman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a joint tenancy is not established unless it is the result of a gift or a trust as a condition precedent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““This is a salutary exception to the parol evidence rule, because a court of equity should not permit the rule to defeat the admitted, or clearly proved, intention of the parties. It should be remembered too that a writing which is called a contract is merely a memorial of the parties’ agreement. It is simply evidence of the agreement and, if it be clear that it does not accurately reflect what the parties had agreed upon, monstrous injustice would be done by forcing upon them a contract which they had not actually made. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here a party opens a joint account for himself and another without consideration, the account is presumed opened for the convenience of that party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.