Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 F.2d 355 - In re Bisley

In re Bisley’s Empirical Analysis

197 F.2d 355 · 1952

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
January 1977
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently January 1977 · most notably In re Shaffer (1956), Application of McKenna (1953)

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

530195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co. · In re Lindberg · In re Osplack · In re De Lancey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that claims may be properly rejected on a combination of several patents taking specific features from each. It is not necessary that a complete disclosure be contained in a single reference.” Application of Bisley, 197 F.2d 355, 362 , 39 CCPA 982 (1952)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * When viewed after disclosure by appellant these changes seem simple and such as should have been obvious to those in the field. However, this does not necessarily negative invention or patentability. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., v. Ray-O-Vac Company, 321 U.S. 275 , 64 S.Ct. 593, 88 L.Ed. 721; In re DeLancey, 159 F.2d 737, 34 C.C.P.A., Patents, 849. Moreover, the conception of a new and useful improvement must be considered along with the actual means of achieving it in determining the presence or absence of invention. In re DeLancey, supra. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.