Clevenger v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1952.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-05-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1954

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 105 F. Supp. 333 - United States v. Clevenger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-05-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William Tompkins, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Otto T. Ault, Knoxville, Tenn., for ap-pellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause having come on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for Hardy Clevenger, appellant, in open court, and the court being duly advised,

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be and the same is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the district court 105 F.Supp. 333.