Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 F.2d 561 - Butler v. United States

Butler v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

197 F.2d 561 · 1952

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably United States v. Jackson (1973), Cwach v. United States (1954)

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

25019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ledbetter v. United States · Connors v. United States · Madsen v. United States · Berg v. United States · Bartlett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * [w]here the time is not an essential element of the offense, it is sufficient to charge facts which show that the offense was committed. * * *" Id., at 562 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The charge in each of the counts, while necessarily general in its terms, clearly defines the nature of the offense, the approximate time when it was committed, and the place where committed. If a second prosecution were attempted, the entire record, including all of the testimony as well as the pleadings, would be available to him to protect himself from such a prosecution.” Id. at 563 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[An information is sufficient if] the nature of the offense, the place where it is alleged offenses were committed, the period of time covered thereby, as well as the specific statutes which it was claimed appellant violated, are specifically set out. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.