Belt v. Holton’s Empirical Analysis
197 F.2d 579 · 1952
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 1988 · most notably United States v. Mori (1971), United States v. Keskey (1988)
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Forness · Laughlin v. Berens · Treasure Imports, Inc. v. Henry Amdur & Sons, Inc. · Jeub v. B/G Foods, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) Correction or Modification of the Record. If any difference arises as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the district court, the difference shall be submitted to and settled by that court and the record made to conform to the truth. . . . All other questions as to the form and content of the record shall be presented to the court of appeals.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he Federal Rules do not permit the district court to prevent parties from including in the record any part of the occurrences below which they wish thus included. United States v. Forness, 2 Cir., 125 F.2d 928 . F.R.C.P. 75(h) gives the district court power to correct misstatements or actual omissions. .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if no such difference arises [as to what occurred in the district court], then each of the parties has a right to include in the record on appeal such portions of the record, proceedings and evidence in the district court as he desires”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re WT Grant Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.