Telechron, Inc. v. Parissi’s Empirical Analysis
197 F.2d 757 · 1952
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently April 1994 · most notably Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc. (1956), Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T. Eaton Co. (1956)
69 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Kerotest Mfg Co v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co · Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co. · United States v. Bloom · Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the circumstances it would seem to conserve judicial effort and save expense to the parties to dispose of the entire controversy in the federal court rather than to send the non-patent claims to the state court where the same evidence would have to be again presented. [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“jurisdiction of any civil action asserting a claim of unfair competition when joined with a substantial and related claim under the copyright, patent or trade-mark laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.