Hogan v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
197 F.3d 1297 · 1999
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 2006 OK CR 19 - Hogan v. State (2006), Jack Dale Walker v. Gary Gibson (2000)
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. Alabama · Schad v. Arizona · Ross v. Oklahoma · Keeble v. United States · Saffle v. Parks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would permit a rational jury to find him guilty”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] Beck claim is not the functional equivalent of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence for conviction; rather, Beck focuses on the constitutionality of the procedures employed in the conviction of a defendant in a capital trial and is specifically concerned with the enhanced risk of an unwarranted capital conviction where the defendant's life is at stake and a reasonable jury could have convicted on a lesser included offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“perpetrated without a design to effect death, and in a heat of passion, but in a cruel and unusual manner, or by means of a dangerous weapon; unless it is committed under such circumstances as constitute excusable or justifiable homicide.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.