Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 F.3d 6 - Agnelo Mendes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Agnelo Mendes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

197 F.3d 6 · 1999

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Jesus Torres-Aguilar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2001), Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003)

16 federal appellate · 9 district ·

470199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Ravindran v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gailius v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Javier Bernal-Vallejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Alvarez-Flores v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be upheld if 'supported by reasonable, substantial and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail' to find that he had a bona fide marriage”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “waived his due process claim by failing to raise it at his deportation hearing, at his hearing for suspension of deportation, or before the BIA”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.