Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

197 F.3d 63

Docket No. 98-2715.

Duran v. Reno

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 25, 1999.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1999-10-25

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2005

8 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Alberto Duran v. Janet Reno US Doris Meissner Usins

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Present: HONORABLE RALPH K. WINTER,Chief Judge, JANE A. RESTANI* Judge, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, District Judge,

¶5In an opinion dated September 20, 1999, we granted appellant’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal from the district court’s (Griesa, Chief Judge) dismissal of appellant’s habeas corpus petition, and ordered that counsel shall be appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § B006A. See Duran v. Reno, 193 F.3d 82, 83-84 (2d Cir. 1999). The government thereafter moved to modify that portion of the opinion appointing counsel under the CJA. The government now informs us, however, that appellant was deported from the United States on February 23, 1999 and that no stay of deportation was in effect at the time appellant was deported. We thus have no jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that said appeal be and it hereby is dismissed, and the September 20, 1999 opinion is vacated as moot.

/197/f3d/63 · .json · Public domain