United States v. Dakota’s Empirical Analysis
197 F.3d 821 · 1999
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-Appellee (2000), United States v. Martinez (2005)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on United States v. Scott · Salinas v. United States · United States v. Carroll · Von Bulow ex rel. Auersperg v. Von Bulow · United States v. Causey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (citing United States v. Collis, 128 F.3d 313 , 320 (6th Cir.1997)). While”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“attorney-client privilege is waived by voluntary disclosure of private communications by an individual or corporation to third parties. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings October 12, 1995, 78 F.3d 251 , 254 (6th Cir.1996). In addition, a client may waive the privilege by conduct which implies a waiver of the privilege or a consent to disclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court created a solution to remedy the concern about potential juror intimidation which avoided possible juror bias, and it did not abuse its discretion in doing so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.