Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

197 F. App'x 258

Wardrick v. Warden

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-09-01

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2006-09-01

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Robert Wardrick, a federal inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Wardrick v. Warden, No. 1:06-cv-01274-AMD (D.Md. May 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials in the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. *

¶2 AFFIRMED

*

¶3 To the extent Wardrick may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, challenging the search and seizure warrant, we deny authorization.

/197/fappx/258 · .json · Public domain