Rice v. LaManna

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 1, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-09-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2013

1 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2006-09-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 James Robert Rice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED