197 F. Supp. 2d 753 - Monroe v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “that a witness contradicts [himself] or changes [his] story also does not establish perjury.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Randle · State v. Widmer

2. “An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim— (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Long v. Stovall · 602 F. Supp. 2d 802 - Dittrich v. Woods

3. “mere inconsistencies in testimony do not establish the knowing use of false testimony by the prosecutor.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Widmer · State v. Buck