Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Ga. App. 606 - Callaway v. State

197 Ga. App. 606 - Callaway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2018

24 state decisions

150199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Carnley v. Cochran · Rice v. Olson · Boyd v. Dutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`A person charged with a felony in a state court has an unconditional and absolute constitutional right to a lawyer. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 [ 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 ]. This right attaches at the pleading stage of the criminal process, Rice v. Olson, 324 U.S. 786 [ 65 S.Ct. 989 , 89 L.Ed. 1367 ], and may be waived only by voluntary and knowing action. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 [ 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 ]; Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 [ 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 ]. Waiver will not be "lightly presumed," and a trial judge must "indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver." Johnson, supra [304 U.S.] at 464 [ 58 S.Ct. at 1023 ].' Boyd v. Dutton, 405 U.S. 1 (92 SC 759, 30 LE2d 755)." Robertson v. State, 162 Ga.App. 873, 874 , 293 S.E.2d 477 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “At trial on September 19, 1989, the following colloquy occurred: "THE COURT: Is the State ready? MR. ARCHER: State's ready, Your Honor. THE COURT: Mr. Callaway, are you ready? MR. CALLAWAY: I've got a lawyer coming but he's in Hinesville today. THE COURT: I see. Well, it's too late for that. You should have had one a long time ago. I remember back in August I warned you of the dangers of proceeding without an attorney and I told you that you needed to get an attorney. MR. CALLAWAY: I know. But Raymond wouldn't tell me nothing. THE COURT: Sir? MR. CALLAWAY: Raymond wouldn't tell me nothing when I went over there to see him that Wednesday. THE COURT: Well, we're gonna have to go on with the trial because we've already got the jury selected and all, and you've had plenty of time to get a lawyer." The trial was completed with the defendant at all times representing himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.