Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 ILL 122 - Bingham v. Browning

Bingham v. Browning’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1997

20 state decisions

501902191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBingham v. Browning

Relationships

Relies on Ostrander v. Scott · McDaniels v. President of the Bank of Rutland · Lapp v. Smith · Farmers' Bank of Amsterdam v. Blair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'Compromises are to be encouraged because they promote peace, and when there is no fraud and the parties meet on equal terms and adjust their differences, the court will not overlook the compromise but will hold the parties concluded by the settlement.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.