Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Ind. 88 - Barber v. State

Barber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 1982

20 state decisions

801925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Magnuson v. Billings · Wilson v. Johnson · Parker v. State · State v. Van Cleave · Ogle v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the legislature had intended to leave to the trial judge, accused by the defendant of having such bias and prejudice against him that defendant could not have a fair trial, the authority to determine whether or not that was really the reason for which a change of venue was asked, the statute probably would not provide, as it does, that in case a defendant shall show by affidavit that he ‘believes’ he cannot have a fair trial, owing to the bias and prejudice of the judge against him, such change shall be granted. . . .” 197 Ind. at 93 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.