Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Kan. 113 - Oertel v. Phillips

Oertel v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2009

18 state decisions

8019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan · General Protective Committee v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Elzig v. Gudwangen · DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance · Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This subsection eliminates appeal to the supreme court as a matter of right from (1) an order which grants or refuses a new trial . . .” (p. 765.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.