Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Kan. 630 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2003

20 state decisions

8019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodwin v. State · Converse v. Hand · Smith v. State · Stebens v. Hand · Huston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A judgment of conviction of crime carries with it a presumption of regularity, and where one convicted of a crime attacks such a judgment pursuant to K‘. S. A. 60-1507, on the ground that his constitutional rights were violated, he has the burden of proof to establish such fact by a preponderance of the evidence, and such burden is not sustained by unsupported and uncorroborated statements by the plaintiff.” (Syl. |2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.