Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Kan. 718 - Van Dusen v. State

Van Dusen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
4
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Shopteese (2007), State v. Foster (2010)

74 state decisions

3501966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boesche v. Udall · Davis v. United States · Patterson v. Medberry · Call v. State · State v. Andrews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the district court in whose mind a real doubt of sanity or mental capacity to properly defend must be created before that court is required to order an inquiry solely on its own initiative. Whether a district court on its own initiative should order an inquiry to determine the sanity of an accused at or during the trial is a matter addressed to the discretion of the court and its decision will not he disturbed in the absence of abuse of sound judicial discretion.” (Syl. If 2.)”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[I]f the accused is capable of understanding the nature and object of the proceedings going on against him; if he rightly comprehends his own condition with reference to such proceedings, and can conduct his defense in a rational manner, he is, for the purpose of 9 being tried, to be deemed sane, although on some other subject his mind may be deranged or unsound.' [Citation omitted.]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““. . . Many shades and degrees of mental illness may appear in the disposition of a criminal case. Evaluation thereof is best left in the sound discretion of the trial court which is in much better position to do so than an appellate court. . . .” (p. 726.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.