Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 Kan. 756 - Brieger v. Brieger

Brieger v. Brieger’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2008

2 district · 18 state decisions

10019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yager v. Yager · Sharp v. Sharp · Preston v. Preston · Haynes v. Haynes · Smith v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We believe the general rule to be that a judgment which directs the periodic payment either of support or of alimony and which fails to provide that the judgment shall be a lien on specific property does not, of itself, constitute any lien on the real estate owned by the father or husband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.