Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 197 La. 233 - Pittman v. Lilly

Pittman v. Lilly’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1996

18 state decisions

40194119501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stanford v. Bischoff · Paramount Wood Products Co. v. Colonial Fire Underwriters · Irish Levy Electric Co. v. Moss · Succession of Uthoff · Hyde v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Should any bond be declared invalid for any reason whatsoever, the party furnishing such bond, may within four judicial days thereafter, furnish a new bond.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.